Claude Haiku 5.5
Intelligence
36.2
top 37%
Web design
1262 Elo
#39 of 172
UI components
1278 Elo
#27 of 157
Input
$0.10
Cached input
$0.01
Output
$0.50
per 1M tokens · Standard · for prompts up to 100,000 tokens
17× the cheapest in view
Models
186 models with live API prices, independent benchmarks and real usage. Filter by what you're building and see your monthly cost.
Prices tracked from the official pages of
Compare AI models
Pick a use case, set your volume, and compare quality against what you'll actually pay.
Build software
Create media
Run in production
High-volume tasks: Classification, extraction, routing and summarization at scale, where cost per call dominates.
Every token-priced card shows its cost for this workload.
Based on Artificial Analysis scores and your workload estimate
Top performer
Highest Intelligence score among the models in view.
Best value
Most Intelligence score per dollar among above-median models.
23 models · sorted by best fit
Intelligence
36.2
top 37%
Web design
1262 Elo
#39 of 172
UI components
1278 Elo
#27 of 157
Input
$0.10
Cached input
$0.01
Output
$0.50
per 1M tokens · Standard · for prompts up to 100,000 tokens
17× the cheapest in view
Intelligence
27.8
top 62%
Input
$0.10
Cached input
$0.01
Output
$0.50
per 1M tokens · Standard
17× the cheapest in view
Intelligence
20.1
top 77%
Coding
68.1
top 28%
Agentic
45.8
top 19%
Input
$0.80
Cached input
—
Output
$4
per 1M tokens · Standard
160× the cheapest in view
A cost-efficient model, optimized for high-volume agentic tasks, translation, and simple data processing.
Intelligence
11.7
top 92%
Coding
49.3
top 51%
Agentic
14.3
top 64%
Input
$0.30
Cached input
$0.03
Output
$2.50
per 1M tokens · Standard
72× the cheapest in view
Input
$0.02
Cached input
—
Output
$0
per 1M tokens · Standard
2.0× the cheapest in view
Input
$0.01
Cached input
—
Output
$0
per 1M tokens · Standard
Cheapest in view
Web design
1101 Elo
#131 of 172
UI components
1061 Elo
#127 of 157
Input
$0.05
Cached input
$0.005
Output
$0.40
per 1M tokens · Standard
12× the cheapest in view
Coding
4.8
top 99%
Agentic
0.8
top 97%
Web design
1026 Elo
#152 of 172
Input
$0.10
Cached input
—
Output
$0.10
per 1M tokens · Standard
12× the cheapest in view
Coding
20.7
top 82%
Agentic
1.2
top 85%
Web design
852 Elo
#166 of 172
Input
$0.075
Cached input
—
Output
$0.30
per 1M tokens · Standard
14× the cheapest in view
A small and cost effective model, built for at scale usage.
Input
$0.10
Cached input
$0.01
Output
$0.40
per 1M tokens · Standard
15× the cheapest in view
Web design
971 Elo
#159 of 172
UI components
911 Elo
#150 of 157
Input
$0.10
Cached input
$0.025
Output
$0.40
per 1M tokens · Standard
16× the cheapest in view
Coding
9.7
top 95%
Agentic
0.6
top 98%
Web design
1063 Elo
#141 of 172
Input
$0.15
Cached input
—
Output
$0.15
per 1M tokens · Standard
18× the cheapest in view
Coding
14.4
top 89%
Agentic
1.1
top 87%
Web design
1081 Elo
#138 of 172
Input
$0.20
Cached input
—
Output
$0.20
per 1M tokens · Standard
24× the cheapest in view
Coding
11.4
top 93%
Input
$0.15
Cached input
$0.075
Output
$0.60
per 1M tokens · Standard
25× the cheapest in view
Coding
71.4
top 22%
Agentic
42.1
top 23%
Input
$0.20
Cached input
$0.02
Output
$1.20
per 1M tokens · Standard
39× the cheapest in view
Coding
56.1
top 42%
Agentic
16
top 61%
Input
$0.20
Cached input
$0.02
Output
$1.25
per 1M tokens · Standard
40× the cheapest in view
A cost-efficient model, optimized for high-volume agentic tasks, translation, and simple data processing.
Input
$0.25
Cached input
$0.025
Output
$1.50
per 1M tokens · Standard
48× the cheapest in view
Coding
15.6
top 87%
Agentic
6.8
top 73%
Web design
1124 Elo
#122 of 172
Input
$0.25
Cached input
$0.025
Output
$2
per 1M tokens · Standard
58× the cheapest in view
Web design
997 Elo
#155 of 172
UI components
956 Elo
#143 of 157
Input
$0.40
Cached input
$0.10
Output
$1.60
per 1M tokens · Standard
63× the cheapest in view
Coding
56.1
top 42%
Agentic
17.9
top 59%
Input
$0.75
Cached input
$0.075
Output
$4.50
per 1M tokens · Standard
145× the cheapest in view
Coding
43.9
Agentic
8
Web design
1122 Elo
#123 of 172
Input
$1
Cached input
$0.10
Output
$5
per 1M tokens · Standard
173× the cheapest in view
Web design
985 Elo
#156 of 172
UI components
978 Elo
#141 of 157
Input
$1.10
Cached input
$0.275
Output
$4.40
per 1M tokens · Standard
173× the cheapest in view
Input
$1.10
Cached input
$0.55
Output
$4.40
per 1M tokens · Standard
182× the cheapest in view
Not sure where to begin?
What you want to build, how much you code and your budget: you'll get the exact tools and the model to use.
Step 1 of 3
AI 101
No jargon. Read this once and every page on AgentCost will make sense.
The “brain”. You send it text (or images, audio) and it sends back an answer. GPT, Claude, Gemini and DeepSeek are model families.
“Summarize this email” → a summary.
A model plus tools and a loop: it plans, takes actions (edit files, browse, call APIs), checks results and keeps going until the task is done.
“Add a login page” → it writes code, runs it, fixes errors.
How your app talks to a model. You pay per use instead of a monthly seat, which is why your volume decides the bill.
Your support page sends each question to the model's API.
The unit models are billed in — roughly ¾ of a word. Prices are “per 1M tokens”, with input (what you send) and output (what it writes) priced separately.
A 750-word article ≈ 1,000 tokens.
How much the model can read at once — its short-term memory. Bigger windows fit whole codebases or long documents in one request.
1M tokens ≈ several novels at once.
A standardized test that scores models on the same tasks, so you can compare quality fairly instead of trusting marketing.
Coding Index: how well a model solves real coding tasks.
You want an answer, text or a classification
→ A model
Call its API, or chat with it
You want a task done end-to-end
→ An agent
Use a ready agent or build one with a framework
You don't code and want a working app
→ An app-builder agent
Describe it, iterate by chatting
You want to cut cost
→ A smaller model
Use the “Best value” sort and test on real data
Usage trends
Real token volume across apps routed through OpenRouter (2026-10-29 – 2026-10-29). Not a survey — what production traffic is choosing right now.
Tokens processed in the latest ranking window.
The tools developers build with every day.
Hermes Agent is an open-source, self-improving AI agent by Nous Research that runs persistently with memory across sessions, and builds reusable skills from experience. It comes with 40+ built-in tools, including web search, browser automation, and vision, plus scheduled automations and subagents.
Claude Code is Anthropic's agentic coding tool that reads your entire codebase, plans and executes changes across files, runs tests, and iterates on failures, all from natural language prompts.
There are many coding agents, but this one is yours.
A coding agent that helps you build and ship with AI
Kilo Code is an open-source AI coding agent that works across VS Code, JetBrains, and CLI to help developers ship code faster with agentic workflows.
OpenClaw is an open-source AI agent that connects to your messaging apps and takes real actions on your behalf, from running commands and browsing the web to managing files and sending emails.
Methodology
Straight from each provider's official pricing page, re-checked every few hours. Every model's “All prices” panel links the exact page it came from. If a page changes and our reader breaks, we keep showing the last verified prices and mark the provider below.
We don't run benchmarks and never make up numbers. Intelligence, Coding and Agentic scores are Artificial Analysis's independent indexes; web and UI design scores are Design Arena's crowd-voted Elo ratings; “most used” ranks are real token volume from OpenRouter. Each is linked below.
From the models currently in view: the top performer has the highest score on the benchmark that fits your use case; best value has the most score per dollar among above-median models; the budget pick is the cheapest model that still scores above the median. Change filters or your workload and the picks update.
A model's position in its own provider's lineup, read from the model family (Opus/Sonnet/Haiku, Pro/Flash/Lite, -mini…) and its price. It's a quick orientation aid — for actual quality, use the benchmark scores.
Your monthly input and output tokens × the model's per-million-token prices, with the cached share of input charged at the cache-read rate. It excludes tool fees, search grounding, images and taxes — always confirm on the provider's page before committing budget.
No. It's independent and free to use. No provider pays for placement or rankings.
Independent Intelligence, Coding and Agentic indexes
Crowd-voted Elo for websites, UI components and other design tasks
Real token usage across apps routed through OpenRouter
Community
Every testimonial is verified by hand before it's published.
Reach the developer
Spotted a wrong price, want a provider added, or have an idea that would make this more useful for your team? Partnerships and collaborations are welcome too.
Your story could be first here.
AgentCost just launched. If it helped you pick a model or cut your AI bill, tell other builders — your words will be the first thing the next visitor reads.